Wednesday, October 21, 2009

Lockerbie Case : SNP’s Christine Grahame challenges QC Paul McBride over tampered bomb timer evidence

In an interesting report on last night’s BBC Newsnight Scotland, the Scottish Nationalist Party’s Christine Grahame MSP challenged QC Paul McBride over allegations that key evidence used to convict Abdelbaset Ali Mohmed Al Megrahi for the bombing of Pan Am Flight 103 over Lockerbie Scotland was tampered with, and went on to travel around the globe on unlogged journeys, potentially contaminating the evidence’s credibility.

Newsnight Scotland investigates the key evidence of the Lockerbie bomb timer :

Christine Grahame MSP challenges Paul McBride over tampered evidence :

Christine Grahame MSP also issued the following Press Release :

Key Lockerbie evidence “unsafe” claims MSP

Scottish police investigators did not make the key piece of evidential material used to convict Abdelbaset al Megrahi, the man convicted of the Lockerbie bombing, secure an SNP MSP has claimed. Christine Grahame MSP has said the Crown Office has now confirmed to her that the fragment was taken to Germany and then to the US by Scottish investigating officers without the knowledge of the Defence team and more crucially the then Lord Advocate, Lord Fraser of Carmyle, the senior prosecutor at the time of the investigation.

In an interview for Dutch TV yet to be shown on UK television Lord Fraser was asked if the fragment, known as PT-35 (alleged to be part of the bomb’s timer) had always remained in the UK. Lord Fraser responded:

“As far as I’m aware it’s always been in the UK.”

Asked if it had ever been to the United States, Lord Fraser responds:

“Not that I’m aware of,” adding that he would have known if it had left the UK, telling Dutch reporters: “What would have gone through my mind is, I’m not accusing the FBI or anything… [but] could this evidence get lost, or damaged or tampered with? No, no I would want to keep everything so that there can be no accusations at a trial that in some way [the fragment] has been fiddled with.”

Now SNP MSP Christine Grahame has confirmed that the same fragment also went to Germany two months before being sent across the Atlantic to Washington without, it seems, the knowledge of the Lord Advocate and the Crown Office. Ms Grahame herself a former lawyer, also claims Scottish police investigators did not record the fragment’s transportation across the world and in doing so broke the vital chain of evidence undermining the integrity of the fragment. She said:

“The Crown Office have confirmed to me that the fragment, PT-35, the piece of evidence that it was claimed by prosecutors linked Libya to the attack was also sent to Germany in April 1990 as well as the US.

“On the 22nd of June 1990 it was then taken to the FBI lab in Washington for examination by FBI officials there. Lord Fraser makes it clear he did not know and would not have allowed this evidence to be taken out of Scottish jurisdiction and control, but that is precisely what did happen. That leaves a very serious question mark over the central piece of evidence used to convict Mr Megrahi."

The senior Scottish police investigator involved in the case, retired Detective Chief Superintendent Stuart Henderson told Dutch journalists last December,

“We couldn’t afford to let something like that go. It has never been in their [US] control at all. It couldn’t be, because it was such an important point of evidence it wasn’t possible to release it. It had to be contained to be produced at the court therefore you couldn’t afford to have it waved around for everyone to see it because it could have got interfered with.”

“But that is precisely what appears to have happened,” Ms Grahame said and separately confirmed she has seen additional documents yet to be made public that showed DCS Henderson had told Crown prosecution officials in a formal legal statement that the fragment had indeed been to the US. Ms Grahame added:

“I am not sure why DCS Henderson’s statements made separately to Dutch TV and to the Crown Office contradict each other so starkly. That is a matter for Mr Henderson to explain. Either this fragment was in the US or it was not.

“I am deeply concerned that during the investigation and indeed leading all the way up to the Trial that neither the Crown nor Megrahi’s Defence were ever made aware that this crucial piece of evidence was being ‘waved around for everyone to see’ as DCS Henderson put it.

“Questions also need to be answered about the associated evidence log that was meant to accompany PT-35. It mysteriously does not record that the fragment went to the US or Germany, even though the Crown Office has confirmed in writing that it definitely went to Germany."


Anonymous said...

Paul McBride has become a Lockerbie expert all of a sudden ?
What would he do if the evidence said to convict one of his clients had been all round the place ? I bet he would scream blue murder !

Anonymous said...

Paul McBride has brought the Faculty into disrepute with his unfounded allegations made against Mrs Graham in this interview and the utterly arrogant maner in which he conducted himself. I hope the Dean will take note of his performance and failure to uphold the Advocates Code of Conduct.

Anonymous said...

Yes someone should complain to the FoA because McBride accuses Grahame of committing a criminal offence on live television and what about some of McBride's clients ? All those are honest and never did it right ?