Showing posts with label Scottish Court Service. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Scottish Court Service. Show all posts

Wednesday, July 13, 2016

Court Speeding: Court reforms hasten trial hearings - according to taxpayer funded report compiled by the Courts

Scotland’s courts are faster – claim the Courts. NOTORIOUSLY slow for the past 400 years - as any solicitor, crook, client & litigant can testify – delays in court – from the Court of Session to Sheriff courts and the broom cupboards of Justices of the Peace - are commonplace.

However, Scotland’s courts have now managed to reduce waiting time for criminal trials – so say the people who ‘run’ the courts.

The ‘proof’ - offered up in a report compiled by - the Scottish Courts and Tribunals Service (SCTS) - claims almost all trials in sheriff courts in 2016 began within 16 weeks, whereas two years earlier the ‘official’ figure was half.

The SCTS claim this was despite a significant increase in mostly criminal cases, particularly relating to domestic abuse and sexual violence.

However, the report – widely seen as more Public Relations than fact – fails to take account of rising numbers of cancelled or abandoned prosecutions of criminals and secretive plea deals by Crown Office prosecutors which have the effect of speeding up trials awaiting court time.

Compiled at taxpayers expense, the SCTS report goes on to claim the closure of 17 courts - 10 sheriff and seven Justice of the Peace courts - had been successfully implemented, with savings already realised of £2.1m and further annual savings expected of £1.3m.

SCTS said while concerns were expressed that court performance would suffer as a result of the transfer of business from smaller centres, there has been "strong and improved performance".

New Court Structure Allows Targeted Investment

Three years on from the report which described a future court structure for Scotland, an evaluation report confirms the vision set out in ‘Shaping Scotland’s Court Services’ is fully on track. To date:

The closure of 10 sheriff courts and 7 justice of the peace courts has been successfully implemented;

The business redistributed following those closures is handled within normal performance targets at the receiving courts;

The expected level of financial savings from the changes are being realised,

The SCTS has been able to target funding more productively on the maintenance and development of its retained estate; and

The longer term vision for an efficient court structure is largely in place and the remaining  elements continue to progress in parallel with the deployment of the new summary sheriff posts.

While there were concerns expressed that court performance would suffer, the evaluation data clearly demonstrates strong and improved performance.  In all courts, the 16 week waiting period between the first calling availability of a criminal trial is being achieved, indeed, in some courts we have re-adjusted the programme as the waiting period was becoming short, with the risk of not allowing sufficient time for crown and defence preparation. Similarly, all courts are meeting, and in most cases significantly below, the 12 week waiting period for civil proofs and hearings. 

This level of performance continues to be achieved against the background of a significant increase in case levels in both summary and solemn business, particularly in relation to domestic abuse and sexual offences, with a far greater proportion of these cases proceeding to evidence-led trials. 

In April 2014 the percentage of sheriff courts setting criminal trials at the optimum 16 weeks was 50%, at April 2016 this figure is 95%. 

Referring to the evaluation report, SCTS Chief Executive Eric McQueen said: “The SCTS Board’s ten year vision is to create a stronger court service which improves access to justice, reduces delay and costs, and maximises the use of digital technology to improve our services. We are now delivering on that, the evaluation report confirms that annual recurring savings of £1.3 million will be achieved, allowing us to target investment to create a modern court structure throughout Scotland, with digital innovation at its heart.

Last year we installed new ICT infrastructure that provides the speed and resilience we require for digital evidence presentation, video links, case management systems and Wi-Fi access across our courts.  This technology supports digital access, particularly for vulnerable witnesses and our prison to court facilities which reduces personal appearances by the accused. 

With the introduction of the new civil simple procedure later this year, we are planning to make online processing available for most payment actions up to £5000. This includes an online portal to enable the legal profession and the public to commence actions, submit case documents, pay fees and track progress online. We will extend this to all areas of simple procedure by mid-2017, allowing over 60% of all civil business in the sheriff courts to be processed online.

Our priority now is to develop the recommendations in our “Evidence and Procedure Review – Next Steps” report. For too long it has been easy to describe our criminal courts as products of the Victorian age. Our task now is to bring them right into the 21st Century, not by tinkering at the edges, but by radical digital reform to improve the quality of justice for all concerned.  Through technology we can allow children and vulnerable witnesses to give their evidence, and have it examined, outwith the trauma and pressures of the court environment and modernise the way we do business in summary criminal cases through a digital case management system.”

Feeling any faster in court – tell us about it! – Ed

Friday, March 13, 2015

Digitally recorded statements could lead to miscarriage of justice as Evidence and Procedure Review calls for recordings of witness testimony to be admitted as evidence at trials

Courts proposal on taped witness statements could skew justice A REPORT published today by the Scottish Court Service claims digital technology should be used to “transform our criminal justice system” and ‘capture’ evidence from witnesses in advance of a criminal trial.

The review, chaired by a senior judge concludes witness accounts recorded at or soon after the scene of a crime should be admissible at trial, and criminal trial procedure should be re-thought to permit such developments.

In response, solicitors say the latest round of politically rooted meddling in the justice system contains little in the way of safeguards for accused and protections for the right to a fair trial.

The Evidence and Procedure Review  – chaired by Lord Carloway - calls for Scotland to harness the opportunities that new technologies bring to improve the quality and accessibility of justice – by recording statements from witnesses in advance of criminal proceedings. The Evidence and Procedure Review was an internal Scottish Court Service research project led by the Lord Justice Clerk, Lord Carloway, supported by a small reference group and a full-time Project Director.

However, legal insiders say the proposals are of serious concern to how the justice system deals with witnesses and the rights of all accused persons – who have the right to test evidence put forward by the prosecution in court.

The move – which some see as a plan to substitute dodgy witnesses for a video recording - may also increase a growing trend in criminal trials where it has become obvious witnesses have been ‘coached’ by prosecutors in their delivery of evidence while under oath.

The growing trend of dodgy evidence presented in court by the crown - an issue familiar to many experienced criminal defence solicitors and counsel -  has now reached a point in Scotland where trials attract regular criticism from the bench of crown agents conduct and the incredulity of witness testimony – among them – statements given by serving Police Officers.

Published here: the Evidence and Procedure Review consists of five Chapters:

Chapter 1 introduces the Review, its remit and details the considerations that led to the Review taking place.

Chapter 2 considers how children and vulnerable witnesses are treated in Scotland, Australia, England and Wales and Norway, and concludes that Scotland there is more that we could to improve the way in which such witnesses are required to give evidence. 

Chapter 3 looks at the legal issues raised if witness statements recorded prior to trial are to be generally admissible.   It reviews the law on hearsay, under which such statements are currently generally excluded, and considers the implications of a rule that would provide for their general admissibility. 

Chapter 4 considers how criminal procedures would have to change to accommodate and take full advantage of the availability of such evidence; it also covers how the infrastructure of the justice system, both in terms of the technology available and the nature of facilities in the courts, police offices and elsewhere will have to be rendered fit to undertake the tasks of recording, editing, storing and presentation of such testimony.

Chapter 5 provides some concluding remarks.

A statement released by the Scottish Court Service said: “We need to rethink what constitutes the best evidence at trial – and this may mean a transformation in the way the evidence of witnesses in general is captured and presented.  It is highly likely that a witness account taken at the scene of a crime or shortly after will be more reliable, full and accurate than their attempt to recall what happened many months later in court. The Report explores what legal and other changes need to be made to allow pre-recorded witness statements to be admitted as direct evidence, and what safeguards need to be in place. There are, potentially, great benefits – these include greater accuracy and reliability of the evidence; the ability to manage cases more effectively; and less reliance on witnesses turning up at court on the trial day.

Scotland needs to move to the forefront of law and practice in relation to children and vulnerable witnesses.There’s extensive evidence that giving testimony at court is especially distressing and potentially damaging for young and vulnerable witnesses; and it is a poor way to get good evidence from them. Although Scotland does have a range of protections available, experience elsewhere, such as in England and Wales, Australia and Norway, suggests we can go further to protect such witnesses and ensure their evidence is taken in the most appropriate way in advance of the trial.

The Report is a starting point for developing ideas and proposals – it aims to be a catalyst for developing reforms that will bring a better experience for those called to give evidence in criminal proceedings, a system of justice that deals with cases speedily, effectively and fairly, and one which remains relevant, trusted and respected by the Scottish people.  The Scottish Court Service will now work with the Scottish Government, other justice agencies, the legal professions and victims groups to explore the implications of the report’s propositions and develop proposals for change.”

Chief Executive of the Scottish Courts Service - Eric McQueen said: “This Report aims to stimulate discussion about the very nature of criminal trials - how do we ensure the testimony of witnesses is as reliable, accurate and complete as it could be; how do we eliminate unnecessary delays and preserve a fair, transparent and just system; how do we make sure that  young and vulnerable witnesses  are safeguarded against further trauma?

"The propositions in this Report could transform our criminal justice system.  We now need work through their implications with everyone with an interest, so that the proposals that emerge are ambitious, workable and will help create a modern, fair and efficient criminal justice system for the digital age.”

Speaking to Scottish Law Reporter earlier today, a criminal defence solicitor said “The proposals presented by the SCS are just another politically motivated ‘think-of-the-PR project’ with little real regard for the interests of justice or the right to a fair hearing”.

James Wolffe QC, Dean of the Faculty of Advocates, promised to consider the report's conclusions in detail but in an initial response said: "It is fundamental to the rule of law that an accused person should be able to challenge and test the evidence led by the prosecution. That is the mechanism by which we, in Scotland, seek to ensure that only the guilty are convicted. All of us have an interest in securing the sound administration of justice in Scotland – and, used appropriately, technology may provide opportunities for improving that system."

Lord Carloway – who chaired the report – previously called for the removal of CORROBORATION – a long held safeguard against miscarriage of justice in Scots law where evidence in a criminal trial is required from two separate sources for a conviction.

The plot to remove corroboration was instituted by the now sacked Justice Secretary Kenny MacAskill. The bitter debate on removal of corroboration reached a point where Crown Office insiders – angry over adverse media coverage – lashed out at members of the judiciary after a number of High Court judges signed a petition against the planned removal of corroboration.

Prosecutors at Scotland’s Crown Office & Procurator Fiscal Service (COPFS) appeared before MSPs at the Scottish Parliament to back the removal of corroboration in an effort to assist the Crown Office in obtaining higher rates of convictions.

The proposal to remove the right of corroboration was effectively shelved after Scotland’s top judge warned the Scottish Parliament’s Justice Committee against meddling with legal safeguards which cut across almost any criminal offence in law – ensuring the right to a fair trial.

Tuesday, July 22, 2014

Lady Smith appointed as head of Scottish Tribunals as Scottish Government clear up of devolved tribunals gets underway

Judge Lady Smith now head of Scottish Tribunals. COURT OF SESSION judge Lady Smith has been appointed as the first President of the Scottish Tribunals by Scotland’s current top judge – the Lord President & Lord Justice General Lord Brian Gill. The appointment was made under the Tribunals (Scotland) Act 2014, where the Lord President, Lord Gill, has overall leadership of the Scottish Tribunals. Lord Gill has now formally assigned Lady Smith to the Office of President, to whom he may delegate various functions.

The main policy objective of the Tribunals (Scotland) Act 2014 is to create a new, two-tier structure for devolved tribunals in Scotland – to be known as the Scottish Tribunals – which will comprise a First-tier Tribunal for first instance decisions and an Upper Tribunal (primarily for dealing with appeals) with a common system of leadership, appointments, practice and procedures for reviews and appeals, under the overall leadership of the Lord President of the Court of Session.

Lady Smith - Anne Mather Smith was appointed a Judge of the Supreme Courts in 2001 and was appointed to the Inner House in November 2012.

She is a graduate of the University of Edinburgh (LL.B. Hons). She was admitted to the Faculty of Advocates in 1980 and was Standing Junior Counsel to the Countryside Commission. Lady Smith was appointed Queen's Counsel in 1993. She served as a Temporary Sheriff from 1995 to 1999. Lady Smith was appointed Chairman of the Scottish Partnership on Domestic Abuse from 1998 to 2000 and served as Advocate Depute from 2000 until she was appointed a Judge.  

She has served as a member of the Court of Session Rules Council and is a past Chairman of the Advocates Family Law Group and Chairman of the Advocates Professional Negligence Law Group.

Lady Smith has extensive experience of sitting in tribunals and working with tribunal judges and members.  She was a judge of the Employment Appeal Tribunal for eight years and she chairs the Scottish Tribunals Forum and the Reserved Tribunals Group. She also represents the interests of the Lord President in relation to tribunals where the relevant law has not been devolved to the Scottish Parliament, on the Tribunals Judicial Executive Board, chaired by the Senior President of Tribunals (currently Lord Justice Sullivan).

Lady Smith’s partner, retired solicitor David Smith formerly with Shepherd & Wedderburn, and more recently a controversial pro-lawyer board member of the Scottish Legal Complaints Commission hit the headlines when the now retired Scottish Information Commissioner Kevin Dunion – who now sits on the SLCC as a board member,  ruled the Commission had unjustifiably covered up documents relating to David Smith’s conduct during his time on the board.

Dunion forced the SLCC to disclose details, revealing Lady Smith’s husband had embarked on a tirade of insults against victims of dishonest lawyers during internal communications between SLCC board members, and branded members of the public “Frequent Flyers” during discussions on how to deal with complaints against the legal profession.

Lady Smith is also known for throwing out the Scottish National Party’s bid to use the Court of Session to block the broadcast of the Prime Ministerial debate on the lead up to the 2010 General Election, reported HERE.

The first Commencement Order for the Tribunals (Scotland) Act 2014, published on Monday 14 July 2014, brings into force section 4(1),(2),(3), and (5) of the Act enabling the Lord President to make this appointment. With the coming into force of the Order and by virtue of the power conferred on the Lord President by section 4(2) of the Act, Lord Gill has formally assigned Lady Smith to the Office of President of the Scottish Tribunals, to whom he may delegate various functions.

SCOTTISH TRIBUNALS:

In Scotland there are currently three different types of tribunals:

  • Tribunals that deal with devolved issues and have specific Scottish jurisdiction and structures (such as the Mental Health Tribunal for Scotland);
  • Tribunals that deal with reserved issues, but have specific Scottish jurisdiction and structures (such as the tribunal that deals with War Pensions); and
  • Tribunals that deal with reserved issues and have GB‐wide jurisdiction and structures (such as the Social Entitlement Chamber of the First‐tier tribunal which deals with appeals relating to Social Security and Child Support).

The Scottish Tribunals Service

The STS provides administrative support to six tribunals:

Reserved Tribunals

The following reserved tribunals are administered by HM Courts and Tribunal Service (HMCTS):

Monday, June 23, 2014

The Lord President’s £60Million stained glass window - Parliament House & Court of Session display their “Hidden Gem” in Edinburgh fringe exhibition

Axe Nurses First: No austerity for £60m spend on Scotland’s main court & judiciary IN the midst of huge cuts to public services including hospitals, the Judiciary of Scotland & Scottish Court Service have announced a celebratory exhibition on their spending of £60 million pounds of taxpayers money on their Parliament House building based in Edinburgh, which houses Scotland’s highest & most inaccessible court – the Court of Session.

The exhibition runs from 28 July to 29 August as venue 402 for the Edinburgh Fringe. Be there, or be aware!

Among the reasons for the multi million pound taxpayer spend on a court no one in Scotland can actually get to without paying tens of thousands of pounds to Edinburgh based QCs, Eric McQueen - the Chief Executive of the Scottish Court Service told staggered msps on the Scottish Parliament’s Justice Committee that “there was no fire certificate in place for the building”.

McQueen also revealed the judges had actually wanted to spend well over £120 Million on the project but this budget was “was brought to a stop to allow us to reassess things and to consider the best strategy”.

McQueen notably did not elaborate to msps on why the £120million plus budget was brought to a halt, probably because no explanation had been dreamed up beforehand which was plausible enough to cover it.

Court Boss & top judge tell MSPs they wanted to spend £120million on top court

Anyone going along to the exhibition please feel free to ask some searching questions on why Scotland’s judiciary are so secretive about their interests and why Scotland’s top court is so inaccessible to the public (– Ed)

Celebrating Parliament House redevelopment

An exhibition was opened today commemorating the completion of the five year, £58 million redevelopment of Parliament House, home of the Supreme Courts of Scotland.

The Lord President, the Rt. Hon. Lord Gill, Chairman of the Scottish Court Service, unveiled a plaque marking the project which was completed last year on time and on budget.

Lord Gill said: “Behind the façade of Parliament House is a collection of buildings ranging over seven floors and containing more than 700 rooms. The oldest building, Parliament Hall, is nearly 400 years old, and it is vitally important that this building is properly maintained for future generations.

“I wish to thank the many individuals and teams who were involved in the project. This work was carried out while the business of the courts continued, and its success has been achieved by effective planning and co-operation.”

Speeches were also delivered by the Cabinet Secretary for Justice, Kenny MacAskill, MSP, Lord Advocate Frank Mulholland, QC, and the Dean of the Faculty of Advocates, James Wolffe, QC.

SCS Chief Executive Eric McQueen said: “The SCS is responsible for preserving this 17th century building which is in a world heritage site and the work involved was a significant challenge. The success of the project has resulted in the improvement of facilities and access for all court users, including victims and witnesses.

“The traditional courtrooms have been fully preserved while at the same time adapted to enable the presentation of evidence, productions and documents, electronically and remotely, from any part of the world. This is part of our ambition to put digital innovation at the heart of our Service.”

The project involved the renewal of all mechanical, electrical and information technology installations, fire safety measures, the introduction of energy efficiency schemes and the improvement of environmental controls in Parliament House, home to the Court of Session and the High Court of Judiciary.

The exhibition - 'Parliament House, The Hidden Gem' - will feature from 28 July to 29 August as venue 402 for the Edinburgh Fringe. It provides a glimpse into the history, traditions and purpose of the Supreme Courts building and will be open Monday to Friday, 10:30-1600. The exhibition was sponsored by Currie and Brown, Asset Management and Construction Consultancy (project managers) and Interserve Construction (principal contractors).

Wednesday, May 30, 2012

Criminality, embezzlement & personal data of litigants sold for cash yet internal study claims judiciary are happy with Scottish Court Service staff

AN INTERNAL SURVEY conducted by the Scottish Court Service claims the majority of judges, sheriffs & justices of the peace (JPs) are “satisfied with the services & support they receive from the staff of the Scottish Court Service. The ‘results’ of the survey, released prior to the expected announcement of the appointment of a new Lord President later this week, claims the figures of judicial satisfaction, catalogued at 79% are in line with similar results of surveys of other court users, including victims, witnesses and legal professionals who, the SCS claim gave similar tales of satisfaction with Scotland's courts.

However, legal insiders have pointed out the survey falls far short of portraying the Scottish Court Service as a capable body, given the extensive delays faced by many litigants in Scotland’s court system and the appalling treatment of party litigants and other court users who either find themselves at odds with law firms in the courts, or cannot secure legal representation due to a variety of reasons.

The survey results, which can be viewed online here Judicial Survey 2011 final report & Judicial Survey 2011 Executive Summary also fail to show an increasing level of criminality within the Scottish Court Service, which has been hit recently by a number of scandals. Media reports have revealed in some cases, members of staff & court officials have embezzled large sums of public money, have been found to have links to, or friendships with gangsters, and in cases currently under investigation have been found to be leaking the personal data of litigants to law firms & debt recovery firms, for financial rewards.

The release published by the Scottish Court Service :

JUDICIARY ARE SATISFIED WITH THE SUPPORT PROVIDED BY SCOTTISH COURT SERVICE

The majority of judges, sheriffs and justices of the peace who took part in a survey were satisfied with the services and support they receive from the Scottish Court Service (SCS).

The SCS provides the staff, buildings, IT and other services to support the work of Scotland’s courts and independent judiciary. In the first such survey of its kind, the SCS asked all permanent, part-time and lay judiciary for their views about these services.

Of the 181 judiciary who responded, 79% were satisfied overall with the SCS. 90% considered the technical competence of court staff to be very or fairly good. The majority were also satisfied with court accommodation; access to legal publications and communications from the SCS. Additional IT support was identified as a priority for further improvement.

The overall outcome of the survey of judiciary is consistent with the findings of a recent separate survey of other court users, including victims, witnesses and legal professionals. This showed 83% were satisfied overall with the SCS.

Eleanor Emberson, SCS Chief Executive said: “I am very grateful to members of the judiciary for taking time to complete this survey. We undertake regular surveys of court users, but this is our first survey of members of the judiciary. The SCS exists to support the vital work of Scotland’s courts and the judiciary in overseeing the efficient progress of both criminal and civil cases. I am pleased that a large majority of the judiciary who responded were satisfied overall with the services and facilities we provide.

Mrs Emberson continued : “I am exceptionally proud of the commitment, dedication and skills which SCS staff demonstrate. Despite budget pressures, the SCS Board, chaired by the Lord President, has continued to invest in the technical training of court staff. I am pleased that this is reflected in the survey outcome. However, we are not complacent. The survey has highlighted areas where we can improve, including ensuring greater judicial confidence in the quality of our IT support. This will be vital as we expand the use of technology to further improve the efficiency of our courts. We will agree other specific actions following from the survey in discussion with the SCS Board and judicial representatives.”

BACKGROUND

The Scottish Court Service is a non-ministerial department, established by the Judiciary and Courts (Scotland) Act 2008. It is led by a corporate Board, chaired by the Lord President, Scotland’s most senior judge, and with a majority of judicial members.

The survey of views of members of the judiciary about SCS services ran from November to December 2011. The survey was administered internally by SCS staff at minimal cost. The survey questions and methodology were cleared with a judicial reference group, including a judge, sheriff, part-time sheriff and Justice of the Peace.

All survey responses were submitted in confidence. The survey sought views on the technical skills of SCS staff; court accommodation; health, safety and security; ICT; access to legal publications; communications and overall satisfaction.