Showing posts with label Offensive Behaviour at Football and Threatening Communications (Scotland) Bill. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Offensive Behaviour at Football and Threatening Communications (Scotland) Bill. Show all posts

Friday, March 01, 2013

Fears Crown Office are prosecuting Religious Minorities ‘to balance books’ as MacAskill refuses to release crime figures, praises Anti-Sectarian Football legislation

Lock em’up - Justice Secretary Kenny MacAskill happy over sectarian hate law progress. ANTI-SECTARIAN legislation brought in by the Scottish Government to tackle incidents of sectarian songs & religious hate crimes connected with football matches “is working well”, says Justice Secretary Kenny MacAskill today on the first anniversary of the Offensive Behaviour at Football and Threatening Communications (Scotland) Act 2012, passed by the Scottish Parliament during December 2011 after an arduous consideration by MSPs.

Lord Advocate Frank Mulholland QC joined the Justice Secretary in praising the SNP’s hate crime effort, saying the legislation is being used to good effect by police and prosecutors The Lord Advocate claimed that 89% of cases reported to the Crown Office have been prosecuted, with an 83% conviction rate yet offered no breakdown of the figures or detail to substantiate his claims.

Both the Scottish Government & Crown Office & Procurator Fiscal Service (COPFS) have so far refused to answer questions relating to the figures including queries over the religious denomination of those arrested and the specific nature of the crimes, stating that the Crown Office were still collecting the data for analysis. The Justice Secretary claimed : “Figures from the first full year of the act are still being collated and analysed and will be published after the end of the football season.”

However, while the Crown Office may still be “collating data”, leaks to the media have suggested the as yet unreleased figures contain a significant rise in the numbers of Catholics being arrested for what appear to be incidents previously considered to be minor in nature.

This has lead to claims the Crown Office has embarked on an operation to balance up the statistics after earlier reports revealed Crown Office data containing a disproportionately high arrest & conviction rate for Catholics was destroyed on orders of Scottish Government law officers to prevent it being considered by the Scottish Parliament during its investigation of the Offensive Behaviour at Football and Threatening Communications (Scotland) Bill

Scottish Government Press Release :Offensive Behaviour Act first anniversary

Legislation designed to tackle sectarian behaviour at football matches is working well, Justice Secretary Kenny MacAskill said today. The Scottish Government brought in the Offensive Behaviour and Threatening Communications (Scotland) Act a year ago today to give police and prosecutors additional powers to crack down on sectarian songs and abuse at and around football matches and threats posted on the internet or through the mail.

The Lord Advocate, Frank Mulholland QC, has said that the legislation is being used to good effect by police and prosecutors. So far 89 per cent of the cases reported to the Crown Office have been prosecuted, and the conviction rate stands at 83 per cent. Figures from the first full year of the act are still being collated and analysed and will be published after the end of the football season.

The Scottish Government is currently commissioning  an independent evaluation of the legislation, which will help meet our statutory requirement to inform parliament on the operation of the act.  We have invited six research organisations to tender for this work. The evaluation will provide a detailed picture of the impact and effectiveness of the legislation, examining how the new powers have been used on the ground, including whether there have been any barriers to successful implementation of the legislation. It will also explore the impact the legislation has had on the attitudes and behaviour of Scottish football fans.

Mr MacAskill said: “The charge and conviction rates for people arrested under this legislation show that it is working well. This legislation was introduced in response to Scotland’s police and prosecutors, who told us they needed greater powers to take a hard line on sectarianism associated with football.”

He continued : “We have made clear that bigotry and religious hatred have no place in modern Scotland and we will stamp out on it wherever and whenever it occurs. The majority of Scots - 91 per cent -  supported tougher action to tackle the problem. The overwhelming majority of football fans are law abiding and want to enjoy the friendly rivalry that is part of any game without this being marred by the actions of a mindless minority. We are under no illusions – the problem of sectarianism isn’t just a football issue. That is why we are spending £9 million over the next three years on a range of projects to tackle sectarianism across society.”

Friday, May 18, 2012

Huge rise in sectarian offences blamed on 'increased awareness' as Lord Advocate & Crown Office welcome publication of Scotland's hate crime data

CRIMES motivated by religious prejudice, otherwise known as ‘sectarian’ crimes – a subject which saw bitter protest & debate at the Scottish Parliament lasts year amid attempts by the Scottish Government to use widely unpopular legislative means to deal with the underlying religious bigotry in Scots society have shown a large recorded rise of 29% on last year, according to data released by the Crown Office this week.

However, the figures released by the Crown Office do not include offences covered by the Offensive Behaviour at Football and Threatening Communications (Scotland) Act 2012 which came into force on 1 March 2012. Provisional figures show that 42 charges were reported to the procurator fiscal under this act in March 2012. In all but two the initial decision made was that court proceedings were to be commenced.

A Press Release issued by the Crown Office on Thursday, blamed the large recorded increase of religious prejudice crimes as “likely to be partly due to increased awareness, reporting and recording of these crimes, following several incidents which received significant media attention during 2011-12.”

However there are those who doubt the figures and the sincerity of the Lord Advocate & his staff to keep pace with a class of particular crime that appears to have gone under-reported and under-recorded by Scotland’s prosecuting & Police services due to an unwillingness to tackle Scotland’s secret, deep rooted sectarian problem.

Commenting on the figures of sectarian crime, Lord Advocate Frank Mulholland said: “The Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service is absolutely determined to play its part in confronting the problems of offending motivated by religious prejudice. Such behaviour is completely unacceptable in modern Scotland.”

While critics have given some praise to the Lord Advocate for addressing the issue of sectarian offences, some have pointed out that it is now an established fact the same Crown Office which Mr Mulholland now leads as Lord Advocate ordered the destruction of historical statistics on sectarian crime in Scotland, to avoid any debate & questioning of the data during the Scottish Parliament’s Justice Committee’s investigation of the Offensive Behaviour at Football and Threatening Communications (Scotland) Bill

Scottish Law Reporter covered the destruction of the sectarian data by the Crown Office, here : SECTARIAN SCOTLAND COVER-UP : Crown Office admits it destroyed sectarian offences data ‘showing majority of crimes were against Catholics’. The data on sectarian offences was apparently destroyed after Professor Tom Devine had urged msps at the Scottish Parliament to request sight of the material for further study.

The Crown Office report on Hate Crime Statistics can be viewed online here : Hate Crime in Scotland - May 2012 and the report on religious aggravated offending in Scotland 2010-2011 can be viewed online HERE

The Press Release from the Crown Office on Hate Crime statistics :

Lord Advocate Frank MulhollandLORD ADVOCATE WELCOMES PUBLICATION OF FIGURES ON HATE CRIMES

COPFS has today published “Hate Crime in Scotland, 2011-2012”.

This brings together figures for crimes motivated by prejudice based on: Race; Religion; Disability; Sexual Orientation and Transgender Identity.

Speaking on the publication of the statistics, the Lord Advocate, Frank Mulholland QC, said: “In the last twelve months there have been a significant number of crimes brought to court arising from an underlying motive of prejudice and it is encouraging to see that many more of those subjected to such offences now have the confidence to report them. We would urge the public to report all hate crimes to the police. They can have confidence that all such crimes will be investigated carefully and prosecuted robustly. We have a zero-tolerance approach for any such offences and will not tolerate bigotry and prejudice which can have no place in modern Scotland. Although not included in these statistics, we have already seen 42 charges reported to COPFS in relation to offences in contravention on the Offensive Behaviour at Football and Threatening Communications (Scotland) Act 2012 since it came into force on 1 March. To date, in all but two the initial decision made was that court proceedings were to be commenced.”

Race
The main findings are: The figures for crimes motivated by racial prejudice show a rise of 8% on last year. This is the highest number reported in the last 6 years. In total, where there was sufficient evidence, action was taken in 95% of charges with a further 2% awaiting a decision on how to proceed.

The Lord Advocate said: “Prejudice and hatred which finds expression in criminal behaviour has no place in Scotland. As prosecutors we take a tough stance on crimes motivated by racial prejudice because we see the upset it brings to individuals and the corrosive effect it has on communities.”

Chris Oswald, Head of Policy & Communications at the Equality & Human Rights Commission, said: "Crimes motivated by prejudice have a devastating effect both on the immediate victims and the wider community: they taint our values of a civilised, tolerant society. These figures highlight a six-year high in crimes motivated by racial prejudice. It is clear that there is still a way to go to ensure that no-one becomes a victim simply because of who they are perceived to be. “However, the figures also suggest that more people are coming forward to report targeted crimes. It is encouraging that there appears to be increased confidence that criminal justice agencies will deal appropriately and robustly with hate crime. The figures also highlight the need for robust data gathering and sharing, so that the criminal justice sector can continue to develop a clear picture of who is committing these crimes and why.”

Religion
The main findings are: The figures for crimes motivated by religious prejudice show a rise of 29% on last year, and the highest number of charges since the legislation came into force. In total, where there was sufficient evidence, action was taken in 97% of charges with a further 3% awaiting a decision on how to proceed. This large increase is likely to be partly due to increased awareness, reporting and recording of these crimes, following several incidents which received significant media attention during 2011-12.

The Lord Advocate said: “The Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service is absolutely determined to play its part in confronting the problems of offending motivated by religious prejudice. Such behaviour is completely unacceptable in modern Scotland.”

Superintendent David Brand from the Football Coordination Unit for Scotland (FoCUS) said : “I believe we have made real inroads into ridding football of offensive behaviour with signs that fans themselves are changing their behaviour for the better. Having been closely involved with the game and supporters for some time now, I certainly feel like we’ve made a big leap forward.”

Disability
The main findings are: In total, where there was sufficient evidence, action was taken in 81% of charges with a further 12% awaiting a decision on how to proceed. The figures for charges received relating to disability show a rise of 20 since last year the first full year of implementation. The most common reason for taking no action for hate crimes motivated by prejudice of disability was the lack of sufficient admissible evidence for the substantial charge.

The Lord Advocate said: “Crimes motivated by prejudice against disability are particularly challenging due to the nature of the offence and while there has been an increase in the number of offences reported, there is still work to be done to provide victims with the confidence to report such offences. I can reassure any victim of such an offence that it will be thoroughly investigated and prosecuted robustly.”

Richard Hamer, Director of External Affairs at Capability Scotland said: "Todays figures are disappointing from a position of the actual number of prosecutions, particularly given the significant numbers of charges relating to race, sexual orientation and religion.They are also concerning in the light of the Scottish Commissioner for Children and Young People's recent report which identified bullying and harassment of disabled children as being a routine part of their lives. However, we welcome the rise in cases reported and look forward to action being taken to address the clear issue relating to the gathering of admissible evidence."

Sexual Orientation and Transgender Identity
Sexual Orientation
The main findings are: The figures for reports received relating to sexual orientation show a rise of 46% on last year, the first full year of implementation. In total, where there was sufficient evidence, action was taken in 95% of charges with a further 3% awaiting a decision on how to proceed.

Transgender Identity
In total, where there was sufficient evidence, action was taken in 81% (13 out of 16) of charges with a further 19% (3 charges) awaiting a decision on how to proceed. The figures for reports received relating to transgender identity show a rise of 2 charges on last year, the first full year of implementation.

The Lord Advocate said: “Every individual, regardless of their sexual orientation or transgender identity, has the right to live free from violence, and without fear of humiliation, harassment or abuse, based on prejudice.”

Tim Hopkins of the Equality Network said: “The big rise in prosecutions for homophobic hate crime is not surprising – the law is new and more people are now reporting crimes to the police. But surveys indicate that around 50,000 people in Scotland have faced homophobic or transphobic hate crime, and a lot of it is unreported. It’s really important that people report hate crimes, direct to the police or via third parties such as LGBT organisations, so that action can be taken to reduce the problem.”

Thursday, January 26, 2012

Holyrood delays e-petitions over fears football supporters will use discussion forums to launch & debate petitions against anti sectarian laws

euscotchurchEU, we have a problem : Holyrood’s e-petitions website offline over sectarian debate fears A FORMER Scottish Parliament employee had admitted his colleagues were secretly ordered to delay the re-launch of Holyrood’s E-Petitions website amid fears Celtic & Rangers football supporters and others opposed to the Scottish Government’s Offensive Behaviour at Football and Threatening Communications (Scotland) Bill would use the e-petitions system to launch counter petitions against each other and the Scottish Government’s anti-sectarian laws, thus “weighing down” the Scottish Parliament’s website with discussions about sectarianism legislation & crimes in Scotland, something Holyrood’s bosses were and still are keen to avoid in an effort to curtail any feeling Scotland has a significant sectarian crime problem.

The information has come to light after a now former member of staff at Holyrood who has registered a grievance against his employers came forward to offer information on the long running absence of the e-petitions system, which allowed members of the public to post their petitions to the Scottish Parliament's website in order to attract discussion on their petition’s topic, and gather signatures to support a petition’s progress through the Petitions Committee.

Scottish Parliament officials had promised a re-launch of the e-petitions system “sometime in December 2011” however the planned date of re-launch was considered too close to the vote on the Offensive Behaviour at Football and Threatening Communications (Scotland) Bill which was passed at the Scottish Parliament on December 14 2011, in a 64 to 57 vote, covered by Scottish Law Reporter HERE.

The Holyrood insider, who cannot be named for legal reasons, has revealed he has in his possession, a series of emails between Scottish Parliament officials who discussed their concerns about “unwanted elements using the e-petitions system to discuss or oppose the anti sectarian bill currently going through the Justice Committee”.

The insider goes on to allege a senior member of the Scottish Parliament branded members of one particular online forum as “******** *******”, a claim already passed to a national newspaper by the insider. The exact words used by the msp which are highly inflammatory, cannot be printed for legal reasons due to the law as it now stands.

Members of the particular forum named in the discussions, which is also not being identified by SLR for legal reasons, apparently stood accused of inciting hatred and making death threats against personalities from the football world & other walks of public life in Scotland. In another instance mentioned in the discussions between Holyrood officials, Celtic supporters also came in for criticism, for their websites organising protests against the Scottish Government's anti-sectarian bill which has now received Royal Assent.

The e-petitions website currently remains offline with an official explanation there have been “design changes & problems encountered along the way of its re-launch” however it has now been confirmed msps and staff at Holyrood are still concerned that opposing sides in the sectarian debate will utilise the e-petitions system to raise petitions & amendments against the Scottish Government’s much criticised anti-sectarian legislation. It can be revealed today a contingency plan has been put in place by officials to withhold any e-petition which touches on sectarian issues. A member of staff has also confirmed in off the record comments that any discussions on sectarianism “will be deleted” from the Scottish Parliament’s website.

The Scottish Parliament’s move to censor any debate on sectarianism follows a pattern of other public bodies in Scotland who have either censored, denied, or destroyed information relating to sectarian incidents.

Scottish Law Reporter featured an account of how Crown Office officials were ordered to prevent data on sectarian crimes falling into public hands, here : ‘Hate Data’ destroyed as Salmond’s SNP fear Independent Scotland viewed as ‘Too Sectarian’ to join predominantly Catholic European Union

A campaigner speaking to Scottish Law Reporter earlier today branded Holyrood’s decision to hold the e-petitions system offline over fears of discussions about sectarianism as an attempt at censorship. He went further, saying he felt the Scottish Parliament was continuing what appears to be an “anti-catholic” policy on the debate about sectarianism in Scotland.

He said : “Censoring debate is not the way to combat sectarianism in Scotland. If as many feel the Scottish Government's law is unjust it is surely our right as citizens to file a petition on the Scottish Parliament’s website and be able to discuss the issue just like everyone else.”

A Scottish Parliament spokesperson was not available to answer any questions on the allegations relating to the e-petitions website, which has now been held offline by Holyrood officials for nearly TEN MONTHS.

Wednesday, December 14, 2011

Salmond uses SNP Holyrood majority to ‘railroad’ through vote on Offensive Behaviour at Football and Threatening Communications (Scotland) Bill

Salmond Crown OfficeWhat Salmond wants, Salmond gets - More Catholics & religious minorities in Scottish jails to fiddle the crime stats. The Offensive Behaviour at Football and Threatening Communications (Scotland) Bill (link varies due to creepy Holyrood tactics of moving the page on instructions from SG –Ed) which aims to tackle sectarian crime in Scotland in a rather limited & badly worded way, has today been passed by 64 votes to 57 in the Scottish Parliament with the SNP controlled Scottish Government using their Parliamentary majority to vote the controversial bill into law. During the debate, the Scottish Parliament showed some typical sectarianism itself by banning a group of Celtic football supporters who attended the public gallery, on the reason they were wearing white t-shirts bearing in single letters across each supporter the words "fans not criminals".

Scottish Law Reporter covered the issue earlier today HERE where Police Forces across Scotland & the Crown Office will now be looking forward to arresting more Roman Catholics in an effort to even–up the statistics on Sectarian Crime in Scotland, and you can read more of our coverage here : Offensive Behaviour at Football and Threatening Communications (Scotland) Bill and on sectarianism in Scotland.

Don't forget our report of earlier in the week which caused a stir : ‘Hate Data’ destroyed as Salmond’s SNP fear Independent Scotland viewed as ‘Too Sectarian’ to join predominantly Catholic European Union

euscotchurchScottish Government fear Sectarian attacks against Catholics and other religious minorities may endanger EU view of independent Scotland. ON Wednesday of this week, whether Church burning anti-catholic Scots and the rest of us want it or not, the Offensive Behaviour at Football and Threatening Communications (Scotland) Bill better known as the Scottish Government’s anti-sectarian legislation aimed at targeting insulting songs at Football matches, will be waved through into law by the SNP’s majority vote in the Scottish Parliament (no doubt after a tumultuous debate) on the pretext of strengthening the powers of the Crown Office & Police to prosecute rising numbers of sectarian attacks against Roman Catholics and other religious minorities in Scotland.

SLR’s report revealed claims one of the motivations for the destruction of the Historical Sectarian Crime Data at the Crown Office was because the Scottish Government are worried the prospects of an anti-Catholic institutionally sectarian and institutionally racist Independent Scotland would be refused EU membership by the predominantly Catholic European Union. The report also laid forth claims from COPFS insiders that everyone from Police to Hospital workers & staff of public bodies have been indulging on online sectarian hate postings.

BBC News reports on the passage of the bill :

Anti-bigot laws passed by the Scottish Parliament

New laws to tackle religious hatred and bigotry related to football have been passed by the Scottish Parliament, despite a lack of opposition support. The new Act aims to tackle the issue with jail terms of up to five years for behaviour which could cause public disorder in and around matches.

But Labour, the Tories, Lib Dems and the Scottish Greens said the bill was "railroaded" through by the SNP. They said it was "bad law which risks doing more harm than good".

Despite opposition, the majority SNP government's Offensive Behaviour at Football and Threatening Communications Bill was passed by 64 votes to 57. The legislation, which has won backing from police and prosecutors, aims to stamp out abusive behaviour, whether fans are watching matches in a stadium, in the pub or commenting online.

Earlier, about 20 football supporters wearing t-shirts bearing the slogan "fans not criminals" were excluded from the Holyrood chamber after parliament bosses told them they were only allowed in if they took them off.

The legislation will create two new offences relating to behaviour deemed to "incite religious, racial or other forms of hatred".

Community Safety Minister Roseanna Cunningham said she was pleased the legislation would soon become law. She said: "This bill sends out an important message about the kind of Scotland we want to live in, because the vast majority of people in this country have no time whatsoever for the kind of mindless bigotry that has attached itself to the small minority who only damage and undermine our beautiful game - or those who peddle hatred by sitting behind a computer screen posting threats of harm on the internet. This is the 21st century, and this kind of behaviour is simply not acceptable, so action had to be taken. The passing of these important new laws sends out a powerful message to the bigots that this behaviour will not be tolerated in a modern Scotland."

Ms Cunningham added: "There has been a lot of debate in recent months about this legislation, but we've listened, we've acted, and the experts are firmly behind it. Scotland has shown the courage of its convictions and has taken the action needed."

The bill was brought forward in the wake of several high-profile football-related incidents, including trouble at Rangers and Celtic games.

All four opposition parties at Holyrood and independent MSP Margo MacDonald released a joint statement.

It said: "Members of all political parties are determined to wipe the blight of sectarianism from Scottish society. It is of real regret that the first piece of legislation passed by this new parliament has been railroaded through by the SNP. The SNP has used its majority to force through bad law that risks doing more harm than good. It sets a worrying precedent for this parliament."

The opposition statement added: "The SNP has failed to make the case for the legislation both in parliament and out - with football fans, religious organisations, anti-sectarianism organisations, children's charities, the Law Society, the Human Rights Commission, the Scottish Justices Association all raising genuine concerns with the SNP legislation. We believe a far more effective response is to focus on education and young people, working with the churches and football authorities on positive, practical, evidence-based measures that tackle the root causes of sectarianism as well robust application of existing laws."

Dave Scott, campaign director of anti-bigotry pressure group Nil By Mouth, said: "The debate around this bill has polarised the political parties but it has now become law and only time will tell how effective and enforceable it proves to be. However sectarianism goes far beyond football and facebook."

What does the bill do?

It creates two new offences - one dealing with offensive behaviour relating to football games, and a second on threatening communications.

Penalties range from a £40 fixed fine to a maximum of five years in prison and an unlimited fine.

The first offence deals with sectarian and other offensive chanting and behaviour likely to cause public disorder.

It covers conduct around football matches, inside grounds, and those travelling to and from stadiums - as well as fans watching games elsewhere, for example in pubs or on big screens outdoors.

In law, the legislation aims to take into account "expressing or inciting religious, racial or other forms of hatred" and "threatening behaviour or behaviour which would be offensive to any reasonable person".

It also creates potential for the imposition of football banning orders in every case.

The second offence deals with serious threats - including murder - made on the internet and elsewhere, and threats intended to incite religious hatred.

That would take in posts on sites such as Facebook and Twitter, as well as specific websites, and actions such as sending bullets or images depicting serious harm in the post.

Scottish ministers say the legislation will not stop peaceful preaching or artistic performance, nor will it criminalise satirical jokes about religion or non-religious belief.

They also insist it will not stop peoples' right to criticise religion or non-religious beliefs, "even in harsh terms".

Decisions on sentencing in each case are a matter for the courts.

Wednesday 14 December 2011 : The day Scotland’s Government gives Police powers to ‘even-up’ Sectarian Crime Statistics by arresting more Catholics

Salmond Crown OfficeWhat the Crown Office wants, the Crown Office gets : A chance to arrest more Catholics to even up crime stats. The Scottish Government have earlier this morning issued a Press Release in clear confidence the SNP majority will wave through the Offensive Behaviour at Football and Threatening Communications (Scotland) Bill which aims to deal with Scotland’s secret sectarian menace by allowing Scottish Police Forces to arrest & prosecute more Roman Catholics to even up the sectarian statistics after an earlier set of figures revealed most sectarian crimes in Scotland targeted Catholics. The historical data on sectarian crimes in Scotland which would have revealed even more shocking figures of religious hate crimes against Roman Catholics & other religious minorities was so shocking, political orders were issued to the Crown Office to destroy it before the substance of the figures could be debated by academics & politicians who called for its release.

Sectarianism is the unmentionable problem of Scotland which First Minister Alex Salmond’s SNP Government are afraid of accurately documenting due to their own assessment that revealing the sheer scale of Scotland’s sectarian problem may skew the predominantly Catholic European Union’s view of an independent Scotland asking for EU membership. There is also now no doubt Sectarianism in Scotland has grown because successive Scottish administrations from ALL political parties have systematically failed to deal with sectarianism due to its appearance and possibly participation in by all levels of Scottish society including members of law enforcement & the justice system.

While some many welcome today’s attempt to tackle the problems, many observers feel the issue of tackling sectarianism via the new bill has become one of pure spin rather than tackling actual crime & sectarian sentiment which appears to run rife in Scotland. The passage of the bill has seen the First Minister and the SNP Government genuflecting before Strathclyde Police & Scotland’s Crown Office & Procurators Fiscal Service (COPFS) to give dream powers which criminalise everything short of standing in silence watching a football match.

The Scottish Government’s Press Release, issued prior to the debate & vote in the Scottish Parliament.

Offensive behaviour at football

Scotland must have the courage of its convictions and give the police and prosecutors the additional tools they have asked for to extract 'poisonous songs of hatred' from Scottish football and threats of harm being posted on the internet, Roseanna Cunningham said today.

The Minister for Community Safety was speaking as the Offensive Behaviour at Football and Threatening Communications (Scotland) Bill reaches its final stage in Parliament this week.

The Minister reiterated that the vast majority of football fans at all clubs have nothing to fear from the new laws but said that the 'bigoted minority' who continue to sing offensive sectarian hatred in the name of football and who cause the public disorder which follows it should not be allowed to 'shame Scotland any longer'.

Ms Cunningham said that the experts are firmly behind the Bill and it was now time for 'common sense to prevail'. She said: "Sectarianism shouldn't be part of a modern Scotland and we need to do everything we can to eradicate it once and for all. To put it quite simply, it will not be tolerated. We must remember why we are acting. Songs are being sung at football matches in Scotland which have nothing to do with football and everything to do with hatred, violence and bigotry. Bombs have been sent through the post to individuals because of their links to particular football clubs, and death threats against a football manager posted on the internet. The offensive chanting of a minority of fans has already led to UEFA taking action against two Scottish clubs and the actions of these fans has brought shame on Scotland.

"The police and the Lord Advocate, the most senior law officer in Scotland, have asked for better tools to do their difficult job. The issues we seek to address did not just emerge in the last football season. The status quo which allows poisonous songs of hatred to be sung at Scottish football matches or threats of serious harm to be posted on the internet has gone unchallenged for too long and cannot be allowed to continue. It is time to extract the poisonous hatred from Scottish football. Banter and passionate support for football teams, even passionate opposition to other football teams, is the lifeblood of football - sectarianism and other expressions of hate are not. The experts remain firmly behind this Bill and Scotland must now show the courage of its convictions and take the action needed. Common sense must now prevail. The well-behaved fans of all clubs, who are the vast majority, have nothing to fear from a Bill which will make Scottish football and society better. This comes down to a choice. You can either do nothing and allow the status quo which allows the mindless bigot to thrive or we can take the strong action needed now and send out a message that this behaviour is not going to be tolerated any longer."

Supportive comment for the Scottish Government's proposals:

Assistant Chief Constable Campbell Corrigan, Strathclyde Police: "My view on this is quite clear. I support this legislation because it seeks to deal with a problem that we know that we have. We do have people behaving inappropriately in and around football matches and we do still hear songs being sung that have nothing to do with football and everything to do with hatred, religion and terrorism." (6 October 2011)

Lord Advocate (letter to Justice Committee, 1 November): "I fully endorse the introduction of specific offences relating to offensive behaviour at football matches and threatening communications. The offences will provide an invaluable tool for the police and prosecutors to target and tackle the unacceptable behaviour that has been associated with football." (1 November 2011)

Henry McLeish: "I applaud the legislation because this is besmirching Scotland's reputation. There is no doubt in my mind there are excesses in Scottish Football, a darker side we must get rid of. I make no apologies about that. We have to be tough. If we want this kind of warmer, friendlier game we need to tackle these excesses. And in that that case Alex Salmond is right, this is an embarrassment to Scotland" (8 December 2011)

Ian Galloway, Convener, Church and Society Council, Church of Scotland: "The Bill has been amended and improved; we have been able to engage with it, as have a range of other organisations. The consideration and debate about the issues related to the Bill have been important I think in moving Scotland forward." (December 2011)

Bishop Philip Tartaglia, Catholic Church: "I share the concerns of the Scottish Government that sectarianism should be eradicated from Scottish society. Fears that the wide remit of the 'Offensive Behaviour Bill' might impinge on the freedom to hold and express otherwise inoffensive views appear to have been recognised and are being addressed." (7 October 2011)

Stewart Regan, Chief Executive, SFA: "The Scottish FA welcomes the new Bill as tangible evidence of the success of the Joint Action Group. In particular, we are pleased to see that it covers sectarian and other forms of unacceptable chanting and threatening behaviour." (17 June 2011)

Scottish Premier League: "It is clear that offensive and threatening behaviour has no place in Scottish football and the SPL will continue to work with all members of the Joint Action Group to address this issue. On the day the fixtures for the new Clydesdale Bank Premier League season are announced, we would hope that Scottish football is in the headlines for the right reasons this season." (17 June 2011)

Pat Nevin, football commentator: "I'm personally delighted that the Parliament are going down this direction: it's been a long time overdue for me and the problem has been in Scotland, particularly the West of Scotland for a number of years". (17 June 2011)

Les Gray, Chairman of Scottish Police Federation: "Now, if somebody's going to tell me that the current situation is working fine then these people are living in cloud cuckoo land because it's not working fine."(12 December 2011).

Paul McBride QC: "I think this is the most important legislation to be passed in Scotland in the past 30 years, because it deals with a problem we absolutely have to solve". (18 June 2011)

Craig Brown, Manger of Aberdeen FC and Former Scotland Boss: "I don't think there is anyone who could dispute the benefit of this. This is something that has to be commended." (18 June 2011).

Justice Committee - September 13

SFA: "We have found the joint action group process to be helpful in examining the governance structure of football in the context in which we are meeting. We all want to improve matters and to see a redefining of the acceptable parameters of behaviour within stadia and Scottish football. We are here to give full support to the bill."

Chief Superintendent David O'Connor (Association of Scottish Police Superintendents): "The legislation could be applied to football or beyond football. We have to deal with a variety of legislation - the whole legislative framework must be taken into consideration. However, we are looking for something that will help us and that will be another string to the bow in dealing with the challenges of football."

Written Submissions to Justice Committee by August 26

Association of Chief Police Officers in Scotland Football Sub Group: "ACPOS Football Sub Group fully support the introduction of legislation which is specifically enacted with the intention of tackling offensive behaviour at football. There is clearly a variety of statutory legislation already in existence which can be utilised, however this does not always fit with the variety of different incidents now witnessed throughout the football environment."

Equality and Human Rights Commission Scotland: "We welcome the Scottish Government's commitment to challenging sectarianism in Scotland."

Equality Network: "We welcome the policy intention of the Scottish Government to address the problem of the expression and stirring up of sectarian and other hatred, in relation to football, and to address incitement to violence and hatred through online and other communication".

Detail on Bill:

The Bill provides for two new offences: Offensive Behaviour related to football and Threatening Communications.

OFFENCE A - "OFFENSIVE BEHAVIOUR"

Intended to deal with sectarian and other offensive chanting and threatening behaviour likely to cause public disorder. The offence covers behaviour likely to lead to public disorder:

Expressing or inciting religious, racial or other forms of hatred. Threatening behaviour or behaviour which would be Offensive to any reasonable person. Covers behaviour at and on the way to or from a "regulated football match", which includes league, European and international matches. Definition based on football banning orders (FBO) legislation, which means there is the potential for an FBO to be imposed in every case. Also covers anywhere a match is being broadcast in a public place, and travel to and from such places. Covers a wide range of behaviours with appropriate relevant penalties ranging from fixed penalty notices (£40) and Community Payback Orders to a maximum of 5 years in prison and an unlimited fine.

OFFENCE B - "THREATENING COMMUNICATIONS"

Intended to deal with threats of serious harm and threats which incite religious hatred.
The offence covers:

Threats of serious harm intended to cause fear and alarm, or reckless as to whether they do. This includes implied threats (e.g. the posting of bullets or images depicting serious harm). Threats intended to incite religious hatred. It is a defence that the behaviour was in the situation "reasonable". This is intended to exclude artistic performance etc. Maximum penalty of 5 years in prison and an unlimited fine.

The offence will NOT:

Stop peaceful preaching or proselytising. Restrict freedom of speech including the right to criticise or comment on religion or non-religious beliefs, even in harsh terms. Criminalise jokes and satire about religion or non-religious belief.

Monday, December 12, 2011

‘Hate Data’ destroyed as Salmond’s SNP fear Independent Scotland viewed as ‘Too Sectarian’ to join predominantly Catholic European Union

euscotchurchScottish Government fear Sectarian attacks against Catholics and other religious minorities may endanger EU view of independent Scotland. ON Wednesday of this week, whether Church burning anti-catholic Scots and the rest of us want it or not, the Offensive Behaviour at Football and Threatening Communications (Scotland) Bill better known as the Scottish Government’s anti-sectarian legislation aimed at targeting insulting songs at Football matches, will be waved through into law by the SNP’s majority vote in the Scottish Parliament (no doubt after a tumultuous debate) on the pretext of strengthening the powers of the Crown Office & Police to prosecute rising numbers of sectarian attacks against Roman Catholics and other religious minorities in Scotland.

However, it appears the motives for the bill’s violently quick passage are anything but clear, and nothing much to do with tackling crime with some now claiming the badly planned anti-bigot legislation, brought about at the instigation of Police Forces & Prosecutors (who themselves appear to be institutionally sectarian as well as corrupt), and seized on by the SNP as an appropriate pro-independence headliner targeting Unionism is more to do with cleaning up the historically high anti-catholic & anti-religious minority crime statistics to allow First Minister Alex Salmond to advance a particular part of his independence policy, that of joining the predominantly catholic European Union.

Speaking to Scottish Law Reporter over the weekend, a Crown Office insider claimed the real reason the ‘potentially dangerous’ historical statistics on anti-catholic crimes were shredded by Crown Office officials before they could be produced at the Scottish Parliament’s Justice Committee is more to do with the fact the current SNP Scottish Government feared any revelations of the now destroyed statistics could damage Scotland’s chances of being accepted by the EU as a stand alone member if it breaks away from the United Kingdom.

Within the now destroyed data, such was the level of reported anti-catholic crimes, the severity of the crimes, the lack of prosecutions, especially in sectarian complaints made against in some cases, still serving Police Officers & even COPFS staff, and the many questions the historical statistics on sectarian offences may have raised in debates at Holyrood, Scottish Ministers felt revealing the truth could lead to questions being raised in the EU over whether Scots authorities could handle sectarianism and prevent Scots based individuals & groups from spreading their hate message & criminal activity against Catholics & other religious minorities throughout the European Union.

The insider, who claims to have seen the now destroyed data which SLR reported on in an earlier article HERE, commented “If the information on sectarian crimes had been published rather than being destroyed on political orders, there would be no doubt in anyone’s mind the statistics would show Scotland is a dangerous place for Roman Catholics. The fear was if the figures got out, this would affect the SNP’s independence agenda and how the predominantly Catholic EU might view an independent Scotland asking for EU membership.”

The credible claims by insiders come on top of ample evidence to suggest that Police & Prosecutors have their own agenda to bring in the new anti-bigot legislation which will allow them to even-up the sectarian crime statistics by arresting more Catholics to blur the statistics, rather than tackling the root of the historically huge ant-catholic bigotry problem which has been endemic in Scotland for years. Scottish Law Reporter has covered the new bill in previous articles HERE, noting there are even allegations of sectarian jibes among the SNP’s own ranks, some of whom have proclaimed their own support for the Offensive Behaviour at Football and Threatening Communications (Scotland) Bill and for the idea that more Catholics should be arrested to ‘even-up’ the figures.

While debate continues to rage on the anti-bigot legislation and the SNP’s true motives for waving it through the Parliament, some media organisations have privately acknowledged they are being pressurised more than ever NOT TO MENTION or report on crimes where sectarianism is thought to have played a role in what took place.

At least seven murders in the West of Scotland this year, some of young men, others involving family members, all widely reported in the press and on television are thought to have been motivated in some way by anti-catholic hate however as yet not one news report or newspaper article has mentioned the fact Police officers investigating the crimes viewed the possibility each incident had an element of sectarianism to it.

In other shocking incidents, the desecration of Roman Catholic churches in Scotland has continued to rise, with a recent report on STV news regarding an incident of vandalism of St Leonard's RC Church in East Kilbride which was so heavily sanitised, the incident as reported by the media took on a completely different view to the actual details of what is very much a sectarian crime, more accurately reported by Scots composer James MacMillan in the Telegraph, HERE.

Commenting on the sanitised STV report, Mr MacMillan said  : In this report on the vandalisation of St Leonard's RC Church in East Kilbride certain details have been withheld. According to parish sources the vandals removed the statue of Our Lady and placed it on the altar where they covered it in paper and cloth and set it alight. Also, the Tabernacle – one of the most sacred objects in any Catholic Church was covered in graffiti. This was clearly a sectarian attack, motivated by the intense anti-Catholic attitudes which have so disfigured Scotland and continues to do so. The fact that a police spokesman, in full knowledge of the specific details of this assault, then claimed it bore no hallmarks of a sectarian incident, speaks volumes.

The details of the burning of the statue of Mary have since been confirmed through local sources.

Mr MacMillan went onto point out while Catholic Churches are being burned in Scotland and in Northern Ireland, none have been targeted in England, even during the Pope’s visit last year.

Other incidents such as the burning down of an empty priest’s house in High Valleyfield, Fife appear to have suffered from misinformation put out by the Police, who claimed at the time the fire was caused by an electrical fault. Yet the fire which burned down the parish house of St Serf’s Church in High Valleyfield near Dunfermline came immediately after death threats had been sent to priests in the archdiocese of St Andrews and Edinburgh.

Another incident where the Police appear to have misled the public occurred in Leslie Fife, where the local Roman Catholic Church St Mary Mother of God was burned to the ground. The Police immediately briefed the press about ‘music’ lyrics spray-painted on a wall nearby yet suspicions over the true nature of the crime pointed to connections to a major Orange walk taking place that same day in the area.

And in a twist to electronic data gathered by Police Forces across Scotland on many forums & websites which appear to spread online sectarian hate messages & racist abuse, it appears there will now be few if any prosecutions of “threatening communications”, due to the fact IP addresses, emails and other identifying traces left by those spreading sectarian abuse online have been traced back to computer networks used by Police, Prosecutors and even offices of the Scottish Government.

The electronic data gathered from internet providers by the authorities is also rumoured to implicate local Government offices across Scotland, several high profile public bodies, surprisingly, several well known law firms and even some Hospital computer networks.

Tuesday, November 29, 2011

Crown Office investigates Holyrood Justice Boss Christine Grahame over election expenses, while allegations of sectarian remarks remain unanswered

Justice Committee Convener Christine Grahame is being investigated by Police over election expenses claims CHRISTINE GRAHAME, the Convener of the Scottish Parliament’s Justice Committee is being investigated by the Serious and Organised Crime Division of the Crown Office over allegations made by a former member of Ms Graham’s staff, Mr Mark Hirst, who claims (and has allegedly provided video footage to back up his allegations) that Ms Grahame (67), misused ‘thousands of pounds of Parliamentary funds’ in her subsequently successful election campaign to win the Midlothian South, Tweeddale and Lauderdale seat in the Scottish elections during May 2011.

However, while the Crown Office have confirmed they have received information from the Electoral Commission in relation to a 67-year-old woman and that the information remains under consideration, there is no mention of whether the Lord Advocate is also considering or investigation allegations made by the former member of Ms Grahame’s staff of sectarian remarks allegedly made against Catholic MSPs in the Scottish Parliament.

If the Crown Office do proceed to investigate Ms Grahame over the claims of sectarian abuse against opposition politicians, it may be Ms Grahame may be one of the first to be investigated under the new anti-sectarian legislation backed by the SNP contingent on the Scottish Parliament’s Justice Committee, chaired by Grahame herself.

The allegations of sectarian remarks have raised serious concerns of Ms Grahame’s conduct after the Justice Committee’s SNP members forced through the controversial Offensive Behaviour at Football and Threatening Communications (Scotland) Bill after messy debates in the Scottish Parliament which features in earlier coverage by Scottish Law Reporter HERE

Scottish Law Reporter recently featured an article HERE on the allegations of ‘anti-catholic’ remarks by Ms Grahame, which were published by Mr Hirst. The accusations, which identify alleged comments made by Ms Graham against now former LibDem msp Mike Rumbles, were published on Mr Hirst’s online blog HOLYROOD CONFESSIONS and remained online for several weeks.

In an article titled “SCOTLANDS SHAME” posted on Mr Hirst’s blog earlier in November, the former employee accuses Christine Grahame of making the remarks during discussions on Margo MacDonald’s End of Life Choices Bill, which Ms Grahame was said to have initially opposed, then changed her mind & supported after the Catholic Church came out strongly against the proposed legislation. As msps including Mr Rumbles on Holyrood’s Health Committee which Grahame chaired at the time raised questions of her position as its Convener & supporter of the proposals, Mr Hirst’s blog, now widely quoted online alleges Grahame’s anger spilled over in the office and into a long diatribe aimed at Rumbles, where she is alleged to have said in reference to Mr Rumbles : “It’s because he’s a f*cking Catholic”.

Mr Hirst also alleged other msps who also happen to be Catholics are reported to have faced more name calling from Grahame, including Tricia Marwick, who defeated Christine Grahame in the contest to be the new Presiding Officer of the Scottish Parliament.

Today the blog has had all its postings removed and can only be viewed via the Google Cache HERE, however a full copy of the content has been obtained by Scottish Law Reporter.

A spokesperson for the Crown Office confirmed to one of Scottish Law Reporter’s journalists earlier today : "The Serious and Organised Crime Division of the Crown Office has received information from the Electoral Commission in relation to a 67-year-old woman. The information remains under consideration."

Today, the Celtic Trust website reported on the story, stating :

Grahame who has the task of seeing the Offensive Behaviour at Football Bill through Parliament in the teeth of a totally united opposition from all opposition parties (as well as the Churches, the Football Clubs and legal and academic experts), was accused recently of having anti-Catholic views (see Hirst Allegations) She has, so far, failed to deny these accusations or to take legal action against her accuser. The Justice Secretary has stated that she has ‘robustly defended’ herself but he himself has not provided any details of where and how she has defended herself. Celtic Trust members have asked their MSPs to ask Kenny MacAskill for more details of this robust defence and we will make them public if and when we receive them.

These latest revelations which suggest that the police are taking seriously the allegations of a ‘disgruntled employee’ cast further doubts on the credibility of Christine Grahame and, by inference, on this thoroughly detested and unwanted piece of proposed legislation.

The Scottish Government must take a step back from the precipice at least until Ms Grahame has answered these charges to the satisfaction of the police and the Crown Office. To proceed to force this Bill through against all reason and logic and in the light of these allegations which further taint the whole process of the passage of this Bill might be the most costly piece of bravado which this Government have ever engaged in.

The report from the Daily Mail newspaper :

MSP in probe over her election expenses

Daily Mail, Saturday 26 November 2011 By Andrew Picken, Scottish Political Correspondent

A SENIOR Nationalist MSP is under investigation over allegations she used publicly funded workers and equipment on her election campaign. Christine Grahame, convener of the Justice Committee, is being investigated by the Serious and Organised Crime Division of the Crown Office over the claims. It has been alleged that she ordered three of her parliamen­tary staff to work on the SNP cam­paign ahead of May's election.

The veteran MSP is also facing allegations she used parliament computers, stationery, stamps and travel expenses worth thou­sands of pounds in her successful bid to win the Midlothian South, Tweeddale and Lauderdale seat.

The investigation was sparked by a former researcher who was sacked by Miss Grahame. Mark Hirst, who worked for the MSP for seven years before being axed in September, complained to the Electoral Commission about the alleged malpractice. Officials at the elections watch-dog last week passed the complaint to the Crown Office. It is understood the country's prosecution service has now asked the police to interview Mr Hirst about the claims. Secretly recorded video footage and emails, handed to the Crown Office but seen by the Scottish Daily Mail, allegedly show Miss Grahame directing parliament staff to carry out campaign work.

Speaking yesterday, Mr Hirst said: “She said at the declaration that winning this seat was like winning gold at the Olympics; well the evidence I have shows this was the political equivalent of doing that with performance enhancing drugs. 'It was unfair on the other candidates, she cheated - that is the bottom line. “We were all instructed to carry out work for the SNP using par­liamentary resources. It might be more widespread I don't know but I know it is wrong. She was taking no chances, she was prepared to do anything to win.”

He continued: “I worked full-time for her and this was not just going on in the short campaign before the election, we are talk­ing back to January. I was instructed to make the 200-mile trip from my home in Dundee to go to the Borders and help with the canvassing and keying in with the SNP database because they could not get the activists to do that. I know the two other staff were doing the same - it was overt political work. And we are not talking about a couple of stamps here and there, it was hundreds of stamps as well as use of thousands of pounds worth of IT equipment.”

A Grown Office spokesman said: “The Serious and Organised Crime Division of the Crown Office has received information from the Electoral Commission in relation to a 67-year-old woman. The information remains under consideration.”

Mr Hirst was suspended on full pay on May 16 when two of Miss Grahame's constituency workers claimed that he was secretly spy­ing on her. He was dismissed for gross misconduct on September 13 but is taking the matter to an employment tribunal.

A spokesman for Miss Grahame said: “This is yet another com­plaint from a former employee who admits himself that he is dis­gruntled. The Electoral Commis­sion has said that it does not intend to take any further action in relation to his complaint. "Miss Grahame has provided all organisations with all the infor­mation they have required and will continue to do so.”

Monday, November 21, 2011

'Seasonally Adjusted' Crown Office Sectarian Study shows Catholics most likely to face sectarian attacks, terrorism in Salmond’s ‘hate state’ Scotland

Salmond Crown OfficeCrown Office destroyed sectarian crime data to make Scottish Government’s anti-bigot bill look good. The Institutionally Sectarian file shredders at the CROWN OFFICE who destroyed the too-hot-to-handle historical sectarian crime statistics discussed in the Scottish Parliament’s debate on the Offensive Behaviour at Football and Threatening Communications (Scotland) Bill by Professor Tom Devine which would have showed even greater numbers of religious hate crimes against Scotland’s Catholic population, have now come up with a new ‘seasonally adjusted’ set of statistics for one year alone, showing for 2010-2011 the numbers of sectarian offences are on the high side, with 693 charges aggravated by religious prejudice with the most offences (58%) being committed against Roman Catholics.

The full report can be read online here : Religiously Aggravated Offending in Scotland 2010-2011

Reacting to the publication of the Crown Office analysis, Bishop Philip Tartaglia, as President of the Communications Commission of the Bishops Conference of Scotland,  said : "Although it has taken five years and repeated requests and in spite of the fact that in the intervening period hundreds of Crown office documents have been destroyed, preventing a more complete and balanced analysis, this report does nonetheless make a useful contribution to the sectarianism debate.”

Bishop Tartaglia continued : “Catholics will take little comfort from the fact that they were previously five times more likely to suffer a sectarian attack than anyone else and are now 4.5 times more likely. Since Catholics represent just 16% of Scotland's population, the fact that they account for almost 60% of the victims of sectarian crime reflects poorly on modern Scotland and is an indicator of entrenched hostility on a worrying scale. It remains the case that the overwhelming majority of sectarian incidents are not football related. Therefore, far more engagement is needed with the church in future by all public authorities committed to the eradication of religious intolerance. I restate the willingness and the readiness of our church officials to assist Strathclyde Police in their efforts to understand and monitor religiously aggravated behaviour.”

The statement ended by saying : “Finally, the Catholic Church in Scotland condemns in the strongest possible terms any sectarian behaviour or criminality from any quarter whatever, as having no place in a civilised society.”

The Scottish Government issued a Press Release on the report :

Detailed analysis of religious hate crime

Statistics published by the Scottish Government today provide new detail on the scale of religious hate crimes across Scotland. The information has been made available following a pledge made by the First Minister that a more comprehensive analysis of data relating to Section 74 of the Criminal Justice Scotland Act 2003 would be undertaken and published.

The data shows that in 2010-11:
There were 693 charges aggravated by religious prejudice - up nearly 10 per cent in a year and the highest level in four years
58 per cent of charges related to offences which were derogatory towards Roman Catholicism and 37 per cent of charges related to offences which were derogatory to Protestantism. 2.3 per cent related to Judaism, and 2.1 per cent related to Islam
There were charges with a religious aggravation in 27 out of Scotland's 32 Local Authority areas
79 per cent of all offences took place in the Strathclyde police force area
A third of the total charges were related directly to football
In just over 60 per cent of cases, the accused had consumed alcohol prior to the offence
Fewer than 5 per cent of incidents were related to marches and parades

Minister for Community Safety, Roseanna Cunningham said: "These statistics show the shameful reality of religious hate crime in Scotland. Like racism, this kind of behaviour simply shouldn't be happening in a modern Scotland but sadly, it seems there are still those who think hatred on the basis of religion is acceptable. We need a wholesale change of attitudes, and this new report provides a valuable insight into the nature and scale of religious hate crime across Scotland. It shows that charges for religious hatred are up ten per cent on last year, to the highest level in four years, and it also shows that a disproportionate number of religious hate crimes are directly linked to football, both in stadiums, on public transport and in bars.”

"That is why we have made clear that we will be looking at further wide ranging actions across society, such as in schools and communities, in addition to legislation to send out a clear message that this behaviour will not be tolerated any longer. This report supports the direction of travel we are taking. We need to eradicate sectarianism once and for all by cracking down on all forms and expressions of sectarian hatred, through a combination of education and tough enforcement. "We must deal with sectarianism in the same way as with racism, and drink-driving. This Bill will not be the conclusive answer or the only solution, but it is the beginning of the end. You can either do nothing and allow the status quo which allows the mindless bigot to thrive or we can take the strong action needed now and send out a message loud and clear that this behaviour is not going to be tolerated any longer."

The report does not present any information about the religious beliefs or affiliations of the people targeted by the offensive conduct. Current legislation defines a religiously aggravated offence as an incident where the offender evinces towards the victim "malice and ill-will based on the victim's membership (or perceived membership) of a religious group or a social or cultural group with a perceived religious affiliation", or, the offence is motivated by the same. There is no data held by Police or COPFS on victims' membership of religious or cultural groups with a perceived religious affiliation as this is not relevant to the definition of the crime in law.

The proposed new laws seek to create two new distinct offences:
The first offence targets any sectarian and threatening behaviour expressed at and around football matches which is likely to cause public disorder
The second offence relates to the communication of threats of serious harm or which are intended to stir up religious hatred on the internet or other communications

The Scottish Government claim the new powers “will give the police and the courts vital additional powers to deal with the minority of people who tarnish the image of Scotland through their expressions of hatred and bigotry at and around football. And those who peddle threats and hatred on the internet.”

However it has emerged today officials from the Scottish Government, Crown Office & various Police Forces have held meetings where they have spent more time worrying over categorising incidents in Scotland as “sectarian” or even as “terrorist” than getting a grip on the use of current laws to tackle Scotland’s burgeoning religious crime statistics against Catholics & other minority religious communities. 

A legal insider speaking this morning to Scottish Law Reporter confirmed papers containing the previous data had been shredded due to the scale of historical sectarian crimes in Scotland along with information on discussions by Crown Office, Scottish Government & inter agency officials and letters from individuals who claimed to have faced anti-catholic prejudice in their dealings with some of Scotland’s eight Police Forces, several local authorities, named civil servants even the Crown Office itself. The source branded the now destroyed material as “gruesome”.

The source also referred to an undisclosed & unofficial agreement between the Crown Office & Police which avoids categorising several high profile, yet apparently random murders & occurring in Scotland over the past year as sectarian motivated crimes, despite the overwhelming feeling within the communities in which the incidents occurred the crimes appear to have sectarian overtones.

lennon godman mcbrideNeil Lennon, Trish Godman & Paul McBride were sent letter bombs, McBride’s comments about “terrorism” worried Scottish Govt officials. More worryingly, in a chilling file note shown to but not handed over to journalists, an agreement appears to have been made between law enforcement agencies and  Scottish Government officials stating “we should avoid branding the letter bombs” (sent by crazed football fans to Celtic Manager Neil Lennon, & Celtic supporters which included  former msp Trish Godman and top QC Paul McBride) “as a terrorist incident”, apparently out of fear it will encourage others & glorify the sender’s actions. Another document also makes reference to the fact one of the intended recipients of the letter bombs, QC Mr McBride, had already gone on record to the media calling the bombers "terrorists, thugs and cowards" and that one official would attempt to speak to Mr McBride (presumably to reign him in over the use of language – Ed)

BACKGROUND TO HISTORICAL SECTARIAN STATISTICS IN SCOTLAND

Back in September, the Scottish Parliament’s Justice Committee chaired by the SNP’s now twice Convener of the Justice Committee, Christine Grahame MSP, heard evidence from Professor Tom Devine who made it clear academics, anthropologists and sociologists were waiting for the publication of the complete data (from 2003-2010) re religiously aggravated crime under the 2003 Act being compiled. Ms Grahame said she also wanted to see the data and ‘will press the Lord Advocate for it’.

Professor Tom Devine told the Justice Committee it was vital the Lord Advocate’s statistics on sectarian crime be released (click image or LINK to watch video clip)


Responding to questions relating to the 2003 act & offences aggravated by sectarian behaviour from John Lamont MSP, Professor Devine said : … I said that only 14 per cent of the cases that were assessed and evaluated related to events at or outside football matches. I was trying to refute the police officer’s assertion—so much of this process has been based on assertion rather than on argument, or on statements with evidence-that the issue is overwhelmingly a public order problem or is related to football matches. Some of the very few pieces of hard evidence from that snapshot of 2003 to early 2004 refute that analysis.

Most of those cases—54 per cent—were in the Glasgow area; 22 per cent were in Lanarkshire; and a substantial minority were in West Lothian. I can consider the reasons why that should be the case if you are interested, because they are historical.

Alcohol featured in the majority of cases, and in 49 per cent of cases, the police report revealed that the accused was under the influence at the time of the offence. Twice as many Catholic victims as Protestant victims were examined, and 1 per cent of cases showed Muslims to be the target. Fifteen per cent of cases arose in the context of marches.

We need the big database from 2003 to 2011 in order to be confident, and it will appear in the public domain in due course. The snapshot so far tells us that such incidents do not necessarily occur when or where one would think that they would—for example, in the marching season or at football matches. They are part of the fabric of certain areas of Scotia, which reflects the fact that the problem is societal

The Convener: You also referred to the Lord Advocate’s analysis, which is a separate matter.

Professor Devine: Yes. That will build on the snapshot, but importantly it will examine all the data between 2003 and the present. Academics, scholars, historians, anthropologists and sociologists have wanted to see that information for some time. It will not necessarily tell the entire truth, but it is hard,quantitative information from which we can learn a lot. It will be interesting to find out, when you next speak to Frank Mulholland, when that information will be release in the public domain.

The Convener: Again, that is a pre-emptive strike. It is going through my head that we will, when we are writing to the Lord Advocate for the guidelines, ask when that information is to be published.

Professor Devine: It is supposed to be published in the autumn.

The Convener: Is it to be published, or is it an internal matter?

Professor Devine: I think that there will be something of a controversial response if it is not published.

The Convener: We will ask if and when it will be published.

Professor Devine: It is not only to be published, but to be analysed.

Coverage of the entire session of evidence at the Scottish Parliament can be viewed in four parts, here : PART 1 PART 2 PART 3 PART 4

Saturday, November 12, 2011

Position Untenable ? Calls for resignation of Justice Committee boss Christine Grahame after allegations of sectarian anti-catholic jibes at Holyrood

Committee Convener Christine Grahame accused of sectarian remarks against political rivals. CHRISTINE GRAHAME, the now two time Convener of the Scottish Parliament’s sole Justice Committee has been accused of SECTARIAN JIBES against political colleagues at Holyrood by a former employee Mark Hirst, who is taking Ms Grahame to an industrial tribunal after he was sacked. The accusations, which identify alleged comments made by Ms Graham against now former LibDem msp Mike Rumbles, can be read on Mr Hirst’s online blog HOLYROOD CONFESSIONS and raise serious concerns of Ms Grahame’s conduct after the Justice Committee’s SNP members forced through the controversial Offensive Behaviour at Football and Threatening Communications (Scotland) Bill after messy debates in the Scottish Parliament which features in earlier coverage HERE

In an article titled “SCOTLANDS SHAME” posted on Wednesday of this week, the blog accuses Christine Grahame of making the remarks during discussions on Margo MacDonald’s End of Life Choices Bill, which Ms Grahame was said to have initially opposed, then changed her mind & supported after the Catholic Church came out strongly against the proposed legislation. As msps including Mr Rumbles on Holyrood’s Health Committee which Grahame chaired at the time raised questions of her position as its Convener & supporter of the proposals, Mr Hirst’s blog, now widely quoted online alleges Grahame’s anger spilled over in the office and into a long diatribe aimed at Rumbles, where she is alleged to have said in reference to Mr Rumbles : “It’s because he’s a f*cking Catholic”.

Mr Hirst also alleges other msps who also happen to be Catholics are reported to have faced more name calling from Grahame, including Tricia Marwick, who defeated Christine Grahame in the contest to be the new Presiding Officer of the Scottish Parliament.

In the wake of the allegations, msps at Holyrood have called on Christine Grahame to resign from the Justice Committee. Online blog Fans against Criminalisation reported msp Michael MacMahon’s comments : "As Convenor of the Justice Committee Christine Grahame has a responsibility to ensure that the Scottish Government is doing all it can to protect people from sectarianism and racism and any questions raised about her position on this matter must be cleared up as soon as possible. Given the nature of these allegations and the concerns that such an allegation raise I would urge Christine Grahame to consider her position on the Justice Committee until such times as any investigation into this matter has been completed.”

Mr MacMahon continued : “Questions already exist about Ms Grahame's neutrality while considering the so called Bigot Bill as she appears to believe that more Catholics need to be arrested to even things up in society. She clearly cannot be viewed as an impartial participant in the process of scrutinising this controversial legislation and while these allegations remain under investigation she should not be steering the Committee's interrogation of the Government's unpopular proposal"

With the alleged sectarian remarks made by Grahame being viewed as a hindrance to the passage of the controversial Offensive Behaviour at Football and Threatening Communications (Scotland) Bill, the Scottish Government have wheeled out occasional absentee Justice Secretary Kenny MacAskill to offer support in an attempt to shore up Grahame’s position as Convener of the Justice Committee in the wake of Mr Hirst’s growing list of allegations against his former boss.

Justice Secretary Kenny MacAskill offered support for embattled Grahame. Speaking at a press conference for the Scottish Government's Cashback for Communities Scheme, Mr MacAskill, who has himself fell foul of the law at a football match after he was held in custody on suspicion of being drunk & disorderly at an England v Scotland football match, was asked if Ms Grahame has his backing and support from the SNP. MacAskill said: "Absolutely. I think she's rebutted these matters firmly. I think there's no evidence to suggest otherwise, and until such time as any concrete information is put forward I think we should view these (allegations) with the contempt they deserve." Mr MacAskill went onto say he didnt believe the allegations will have any effect on the SNP’s widely criticised anti-sectarian laws, which some say are dreamed up by party insiders & the Police to bring about Police powers to arrest people for just about anything including singing the National Anthem and making the sign of the cross.

This is the second time in recent times that a Justice Committee Convener has faced calls to resign, where only last year, the Scottish Conservative now former msp, Bill Aitken was forced to quit the Convener’s position after he branded a rape victim a prostitute and then lied about his remarks, attempting to blame a newspaper and a journalist for making it up.

Christine Grahame herself has a history of ‘controversy, where in her earlier stint as Convener of the Justice 1 Committee of the Scottish Parliament, she agreed with the then Committee’s decision to ban members of the public speaking in front of msps about their experiences with lawyers while the Committee hosted regular friendly visits from the Law Society of Scotland. Ms Grahame’s Justice Committee report unsurprisingly found in favour of the Law Society of Scotland and that self regulation of lawyers, where lawyers are allowed to regulate themselves be maintained. Ms Grahame is reported to have ‘made remarks’ against individuals & law reform campaigners during the lengthy episode where vested interests were prioritised over consumers.

In a more bizarre incident, Ms Grahame also claimed at one point the Security Services were bugging her telephones however no evidence was offered up to substantiate the claims, branded as fanciful by others.

Coverage of the scandal involving the sectarian remarks alleged to have been made by Christine Grahame follows :

Grahame urged to stand down during ‘sectarian’ investigation

Lucy Adams Chief Reporter 11 Nov 2011

POLITICIANS have called for the head of Holyrood’s Justice Committee to stand down until allegations that she made sectarian comments have been fully investigated.

It emerged yesterday Christine Grahame, SNP MSP and convenor of the committee, has been accused by a former employee of making sectarian remarks about colleagues, including members of her own party. The Justice Committee is currently overseeing the anti-sectarian legislation, the Offensive Behaviour at Football and Threatening Communication Bill, that is going through Parliament.

The allegations have been published online by Mark Hirst, her former senior political adviser, who was sacked in September for gross misconduct and is taking Ms Grahame to an employment tribunal claiming unfair dismissal. The complaint has been sent to the presiding officer. Ms Grahame yesterday described the claims as “ridiculous”.

Labour MSP Michael McMahon said: “Christine Grahame has a responsibility to ensure the Scottish Government is doing all it can to protect people from sectarianism and racism and any questions raised about her position on this matter must be cleared up as soon as possible. “I would urge Ms Grahame to consider her position on the Justice Committee until such times as any investigation into this matter has been completed. Questions already exist about her neutrality while considering the so-called Bigot Bill, as she appears to believe more Catholics need to be arrested to even things up.”

The Herald revealed in September the Electoral Commission was investigating allegations made by Mr Hirst about Ms Grahame. This is ongoing. Lothian and Borders Police probed allegations made by Mr Hirst in September but said they would take no further action.

A spokeswoman for Ms Grahame said: “Mr Hirst’s comments have absolutely no credibility and Ms Grahame will not respond to such ridiculous claims. “Mr Hirst himself admits he is a disgruntled former employee who has been dismissed for gross misconduct and his previous allegations against Ms Grahame have been rejected by the police and dismissed by the Standards Commissioner. “His comments have absolutely no credibility.”

Grahame backed in sectarian remarks furore

Lucy Adams Chief Reporter 12 Nov 2011

A SENIOR Scottish Government minister has backed Justice Committee convener Christine Grahame amid allegations that she made sectarian remarks. The Electoral Commission is investigating the allegations made by Mark Hirst, a former senior political advisor in her office. She faced calls by Labour MSP Michael McMahon to “consider her position on the Justice Committee until such times as any investigation into this matter has been completed”.

However, Justice Secretary Kenny MacAskill said Ms Grahame has “rebutted these matters firmly” and the allegations should be viewed “with the contempt they deserve”.Mr MacAskill also said he will stand by the conviction of the only man found guilty of the Lockerbie bombing “until such time as that matter were to be reviewed”.

Speaking at a press conference for the Scottish Government’s Cashback for Communities Scheme, Mr MacAskill said he does not believe the allegations against Ms Grahame will have any effect on the Offensive Behaviour at Football and Threatening Communications Bill, which is under scrutiny by the Justice Committee. He said: “I’ve known Christine Grahame for many years and I’ve never known her to have, frankly, any real interest in religion, and certainly to have no sectarian views at all.”

Ms Grahame is also a member of the Justice for Megrahi campaign. Earlier this week, she spearheaded calls to continue a petition by the group calling for an independent inquiry into the conviction of Abdelbaset al Megrahi for his role in the Lockerbie bombing. All five SNP MSPs on the committee, including Ms Grahame, voted to continue the petition alongside Liberal Democrat Alison McInnes. Labour’s James Kelly and Graeme Pearson and Conservative John Lamont were outvoted in an attempt to strike it down.

When asked if he believes Megrahi’s conviction is sound, Mr MacAskill said: “Well, it stands by the Scottish court. I have the highest regard for the court service in Scotland. He was lawfully convicted and until such time as that matter were to be reviewed I stand by that, as I stand by every other conviction in the Scottish court.”